Thursday, April 18, 2013

kdepim-4.4 (kmail1) in Gentoo - unsupported, dying, dead

Bitrot is accumulating, and while we've tried to keep kdpim-4.4 running in Gentoo as long as possible, the time is slowly coming to say goodbye. In effect this is triggered by annoying problems like these:
There are probably many more such bugs around, where incompatibilities between kdepim-4.4 and kdepimlibs of more recent releases occur or other software updates have led to problems. Slowly it's getting painful, and definitely more painful than running a recent kdepim-4.10 (which has in my opinion improved quite a lot over the last major releases).
Please be prepared for the following steps:
  • end of april 2013, all kdepim-4.4 packages in the Gentoo portage tree will be package.masked 
  • end of may 2013, all kdepim-4.4 packages in the Gentoo portage tree will be removed
  • afterwards, we will finally be able to simplify the eclasses a lot by removing the special handling
We still have the kdepim-4.7 upgrade guide around, and it also applies to the upgrade from kdepim-4.4 to any later version. Feel free to improve it or suggest improvements.

R.I.P. kmail1.

Sunday, April 14, 2013

NVIDIA 300 series Linux drivers - worst functionality regression ever

For a long time, I've been extraordinarily happy with both NVIDIA graphics hardware and the vendor-supplied binary drivers. Functionality, stability, speed. However, things are changing and I'm frustrated. Let me tell you why.

Part of my job is to do teaching and presentations. I have a trusty thinkpad with a VGA output which can in principle supply about every projector with a decent signal. Most of these projectors do not display the native 1920x1200 resolution of the built-in display. This means, if you configure the second display to clone the first, you will end up seeing only part of the screen. In the past, I solved this by using nvidia-settings and setting the display to a lower resolution supported by the projector (nvidia-settings told me which ones I could use) and then let it clone things. Not so elegant, but everything worked fine- and this amount of fiddling is still something that can be done in the front of a seminar room while someone is introducing you and the audience gets impatient.

Now consider my surprise when suddenly after a driver upgrade the built-in display was completely glued to the native resolution. Only setting possible - 1920x1200. The first time I saw that I was completely clueless what to do; starting the talk took a bit longer than expected. A simple, but completely crazy solution exists; disable the built-in display and only enable the projector output. Then your X session is displayed there and resized accordingly. You'll have to look at the silver screen while talking, but that's not such a problem. A bigger pain actually is that you may have to leave the podium in a hurry and then have no video output at all...

Now, googling. Obviously a lot of other people have the same problem as well. Hacks like this one just don't work, I've ended up with nice random screen distortions. Here's a thread on the nvidia devtalk forum from where I can quote, "The way it works now is more "correct" than the old behavior, but what the user sees is that the old way worked and the new does not." It seems like now nVidia expects that each application handles any mode switching internally. My usecase does not even exist from their point of view. Here's another thread, and in general users are not happy about it.

Finally, I found this link where the following reply is given: "The driver supports all of the scaling features that older drivers did, it's just that nvidia-settings hasn't yet been updated to make it easy to configure those scaling modes from the GUI." Just great.

Gentlemen, this is a serious annoyance. Please fix it. Soon. Not everyone is willing to read up on xrandr command line options and fiddle with ViewPortIn, ViewPortOut, MetaModes and other technical stuff. Especially while the audience is waiting.

Saturday, April 13, 2013

OpenPGP smartcards and Gentoo - part 1: hardware

Gnupg is an excellent tool for encryption and signing, however, while breaking encryption or forging signatures of large key size is likely somewhere between painful and impossible even for agencies on significant budget, all this is always only as safe as your private key. Let's insert the obvious semi-relevant xkcd reference here, but someone hacking your computer, installing a keylogger and grabbing the key file is more likely. While there are no preventive measures that work for all conceivable attacks, you can at least make things as hard as possible. Be smart, use a smartcard. You'll get a number of additional bonuses on the way. I'm writing up here my personal experiences, as a kind of guide. Also, I am picking a compromise between ultra-security and convenience. Please do not complain if you find guides on the web on how to do things "better".

The smart cards

Obviously, you will need one or more OpenPGP-compatible smart cards and a reader device. I ordered my cards from kernel concepts since that shop is referred in the GnuPG smartcard howto. These are the cards developed by g10code, which is Werner Koch's company (he is the principal author of GnuPG). The website says "2048bit RSA capable", the text printed on the card says "3072bit RSA capable", but at least the currently sold cards support 4096bit RSA keys just fine. (You will need at least app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.19-r2 for encryption keys bigger than 3072bit, see this link and this portage commit.)

The readers

While the GnuPG smartcard howto provides a list of supported reader devices, that list (and indeed the whole document) is a bit stale. The best source of information that I found was the page on the Debian Wiki; Yutaka Niibe, who edits that page regularly, is also one of the code contributors to the smartcard part of GnuPG. In general there are two types of readers, those with a stand-alone pinpad and those without. The extra pinpad takes care that for normal operations like signing and encryption the pin for unlocking the keys is never entering the computer itself- so without tampering with the reader hardware it is impossible pretty hard to sniff it. I bought a SCM SPG532 reader, one of the devices supported ever first by GnuPG, however it's not produced anymore and you may have to resort to newer models soon.

Drivers and software

Now, you'll want to activate the USE flag "smartcard" and maybe "pkcs11", and rebuild app-crypt/gnupg. Afterwards, you may want to log out and back in again, since you may need the gpg-agent from the new emerge.
Several different standards for card reader access exist. One particular is the USB standard for integrated circuit card interface devices, short CCID; the driver for that one is directly built into GnuPG, and the SCM SPG532 is such a device. Another set of drivers is provided by sys-apps/pcsc-lite; that will be used by GnuPG if the built-in stuff fails, but requires a daemon to be running (pcscd, just add it to the default runlevel and start it). The page on the Debian Wiki also lists the required drivers.
These drivers do not need much (or any) configuration, but should work in principle out of the box. Testing is easy, plug in the reader, insert a card, and issue the command
gpg --card-status
If it works, you should see a message about (among other things) manufacturer and serial number of your card. Otherwise, you'll just get an uninformative error. The first thing to check is then (especially for CCID) if the device permissions are OK; just repeat above test as root. If you can now see your card, you know you have permission trouble.
Fiddling with the device file permissions was a serious pain, since all online docs are hopelessly outdated. Please forget about the files linked in the GnuPG smartcard howto. (One cannot be found anymore, the other does not work alone and tries to do things in unnecessarily complicated ways.) At some point in time I just gave up on things like user groups and told udev to hardwire the device to my user account: I created the following file into /etc/udev/rules.d/gnupg-ccid.rules:
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ENV{PRODUCT}=="4e6/e003/*", OWNER:="huettel", MODE:="600"
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ENV{PRODUCT}=="4e6/5115/*", OWNER:="huettel", MODE:="600"
With similar settings it should in principle be possible to solve all the permission problems. (You may want to change the USB id's and the OWNER for your needs.) Then, a quick
udevadm control --reload-rules
followed by unplugging and re-plugging the reader. Now you should be able to check the contents of your card.
If you still have problems, check the following: for accessing the cards, GnuPG starts a background process, the smart card daemon (scdaemon). scdaemon tends to hang every now and then after removing a card. Just kill it (you need SIGKILL)
killall -9 scdaemon
and try again accessing the card afterwards; the daemon is re-started by gnupg. A lot of improvements in smart card handling are scheduled for gnupg-2.0.20; I hope this will be fixed as well.
Here's how a successful card status command looks like on a blank card:
huettel@pinacolada ~ $ gpg --card-status
Application ID ...: D276000124010200000500000AFA0000
Version ..........: 2.0
Manufacturer .....: ZeitControl
Serial number ....: 00000AFA
Name of cardholder: [not set]
Language prefs ...: de
Sex ..............: unspecified
URL of public key : [not set]
Login data .......: [not set]
Signature PIN ....: forced
Key attributes ...: 2048R 2048R 2048R
Max. PIN lengths .: 32 32 32
PIN retry counter : 3 0 3
Signature counter : 0
Signature key ....: [none]
Encryption key....: [none]
Authentication key: [none]
General key info..: [none]
huettel@pinacolada ~ $

That's it for now, part 2 will be about setting up the basic card data and gnupg functions, then we'll eventually proceed to ssh and pam...

Edit: You can find part 2 here.

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Gentoo 10.0 to 13.0 profiles upgrade & server profiles going away

We've generated a new set of profiles for Gentoo installation. These are now called 13.0 instead of 10.0, e.g., "default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop" becomes "default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop".
Everyone should upgrade as soon as possible. This brings (nearly) no user-visible changes. Some new files have been added to the profile directories that make it possible for the developers to do more fine-grained use flag masking (see PMS-5 for the details), and this formally requires a new profile tree with EAPI=5 (and a recent portage version, but anything since sys-apps/portage-2.1.11.31 should work and anything since sys-apps/portage-2.1.11.50 should be perfect).
Since the 10.0 profiles will be deprecated immediately and removed in a year, emerge will suggest a replacement on every run. I strongly suggest you just follow that recommendation.
One additional change has been added to the package: the "server" profiles will be removed; they do not exist in the 13.0 tree anymore. If you have used a server profile so far, you should migrate to its parent, i.e. from "default/linux/amd64/10.0/server" to "default/linux/amd64/13.0". This may change the default value of some use-flags (the setting in "server" was USE="-perl -python snmp truetype xml"), so you may want to check the setting of these flags after switching profile, but otherwise nothing happens.

Friday, February 8, 2013

KDE 4.10.0 plasma-desktop crashes and qt frustrations

While on my machine KDE 4.10.0 runs perfectly fine, unfortunately a lot of Gentoo users see immediate crashes of plasma-desktop - which makes the graphical desktop environment completely unuseable. We know more or less what happened in the meantime, just not how to properly fix it...
The problem:
  • plasma-desktop uses a new code path in 4.10, which triggers a Qt bug leading to immediate SIGSEGV. 
  • The Qt bug only becomes fatal for some compiler options, and only on 64bit systems (amd64).
  • The Qt bug may be a fundamental architectural problem that needs proper thought.
The links:
The bugfixing situation:
  • Reverting the commit to plasma-workspace that introduced the problem makes the crash go away, but plasma-desktop starts hogging 100% CPU after a while. (This is done in plasma-workspace-4.10.0-r1 as a stopgap measure.) Kinda makes sense since the commit was there to fix a problem - now we hit the original problem.
  • The bug seems not to occur if Qt is compiled with CFLAGS="-Os". Cause unknown. 
  • David E. Narváez aka dmaggot wrote a patch for Qt that fixes this particular codepath but likely does not solve the global problem.
  • So far comments from Qt upstream indicate that this is in their opinion not the right way to fix the problem.
  • Our Gentoo Qt team understandably only wants to apply a patch if it has been accepted upstream.
Right now, the only option we (as Gentoo KDE team) have is wait for someone to pick up the phone. Either from KDE (to properly use the old codepath or provide some alternative), or from Qt (to fix the bug or apply a workaround)...

Sorry & stay tuned.

Thursday, January 24, 2013

PhD position available: A carbon nanotube as a moving weak link

The combination of localized states within carbon nanotubes and superconducting contact materials leads to a manifold of fascinating physical phenomena and is a very active area of current research. An additional bonus is that the carbon nanotube can be suspended, i.e. the quantum dot between the contacts forms a nanomechanical system. In this research field a PhD position is immediately available; the working title of the project is "A carbon nanotube as a moving weak link".

You will develop and fabricate chip structures combining various superconductor contact materials with ultra-clean, as-grown carbon nanotubes. Together with your colleagues, you will optimize material, chip geometry, nanotube growth process, and measurement electronics. Measurements will take place in one of our ultra-low temperature setups.

Good knowledge of superconductivity is required. Certainly helpful is knowledge of semiconductor nanostructures and low temperature physics, as well as basic familiarity with Linux. The starting salary is 1/2 TV-L E13.

Interested? Contact Andreas K. Hüttel (e-mail: andreas.huettel@ur.de, web: http://www.physik.uni-r.de/forschung/huettel/ ) for more information!

PhD position available: Gigahertz nanomechanics with carbon nanotubes

We are currently working on integrating carbon nanotube nanomechanical systems into superconducting radio-frequency electronics. Overall objective is the detection and control of nanomechanical motion towards its quantum limit. In this project, we've got a PhD position with project working title "Gigahertz nanomechanics with carbon nanotubes" available immediately.

You will design and fabricate superconducting on-chip structures suitable as both carbon nanotube contact electrodes and gigahertz circuit elements. In addition, you will build up and use - together with your colleagues - two ultra-low temperature measurement setups to conduct cutting-edge measurements.

Good knowledge of electrodynamics and possibly superconductivity are required. Certainly helpful is low temperature physics, some sort of programming experience, as well as basic familiarity with Linux. The starting salary is 1/2 TV-L E13.

Interested? Contact Andreas K. Hüttel (e-mail: andreas.huettel@ur.de, web: http://www.physik.uni-r.de/forschung/huettel/ ) for more information!